Category: Global Issues Affecting all of Us

  • The End of Humanity? It’s All in the Numbers

    For the human population to remain steady, each woman needs to have at least two children – one to replace herself and one to replace her mate. The actual number works out to be about 2.1 – to allow for accidents and the like.

    In this very good presentation by Hans Rosling, he very clearly demonstrates how much of the western world is way below 2 births per woman, in fact many countries hover around 1, and he shows how as countries “modernize” their birth rates drop rapidly.

    That means the end of the human race!

    With a little bit more thinking (see here), we’re talking about the year 2300 for the population to be less than 1 billion people. And then afterwards where does it end??!!!

    Hans Rosling’s web site is here: www.gapminder.org.

    Hans Rosling

    Jeremiah Josey

  • Wireless Power

    Recent studies into the prehistoric structures in Egypt and Central and Southern Americas reveal vast spread of knowledge far beyond our own: ancient power stations and wireless power.  Tesla in the 1890’s may have rediscovered what was known – and in common use – more than 12,000 years ago.

    Watch the video: The secrets hidden in the pyramids of Egypt (Harun Yahya)

    Jeremiah Josey

  • Piracy? Or Different Rules of the Game

    This was a good read about so-called “piracy” in China (link here).  What people do not understand is that this is not pirating. This has been labelled such by business lobbyists, out to protect their future revenue streams.

    Being a “Pirate” is taking something from someone else, something that is already owned. A “potential market” no one owns. It’s potential. In the future. Who owns the market is governed by who makes the best product or provides the best service for it – or the market is shared. Entering a market with a copied similar product is simply people doing business. We humans have done this for a very long time. We have always done it. We always will. It’s human.

    We have anti monopoly laws and we have patent protection laws: at their core, the two are in direct conflict with each other. No wonder the West is confused.

    Patents are only a recent invention in human history, and serve to stymie development and innovation, not stimulate it. No, I do not like my products being copied and stolen, but I like how it makes me think: creative and inventive to keep up development and protect – and share – my assets. It makes me create my revenue in different ways, creative ways.

    Google is the good example of being creative. How many patents? And how do they protect new developments? Very few, if any, and very carefully. (Read about it here).

    Patents are dangerous and create false economies. Look at what GM did with electric car and battery technology in the early 2000’s. They “bought” the patents to revolutionary battery technology and then shelved it, along with burying (and destroying) all of their existing physical electric car developments.

    In the end this was good a good thing. The Tesla car company in California rose up from the GM team that was dis-enfranchised, and they now make great cars. The documentary “Who Killed the Electric Car” was created and a following emerged. Now 10 years later and all major marques are releasing electrics cars or hybrid electrics.

    This buy & bury technique has been replicated as long as there has been “product rights”.

    And who invented the radio? There were lots of people involved, and junior school history teaches incorrectly that it was the Italian Marconi?  How, when he copied 17 patents to do so? Patents created by Nicoli Tesla 10 years earlier?

    So, copy, China. Copy, copy, copy. Make things better, more efficient, more sustainable. Please.

    What doesn’t kill us only makes us stronger.

    Jeremiah Josey

  • No need to be afraid of a tax on carbon

    http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/politics/no-need-to-be-afraid-of-a-tax-on-carbon-20100903-14tqh.html

    Love it, love it, love it!

    Before the Australian election climate change was relegated to a distant nowhere in the election work up of each major party.  Now it’s topic to swing a government of some 20 odd million people.

    Here’s a speech by someone who has a very REAL concern for climate change: Maldives President Mohamed Nasheed (average country height above sea level 1.5 meters – 5 feet) .  Mohamed states his country’s commitment to being carbon neutral by 2020. He’s not doing it to make a difference – they simple won’t – Maldives contributes 250,000 MT of CO2 per year, Australia produces 100,000,000 MT, the USA 1,600,000,000 MT (See here for the data)  – the Maldives  won’t even make a dent.

    They are doing to make a point: that giving up is not an option.

    And with a little bit of politicking and “power” mongering, maybe Australia will commit to the same goal too??

    Maybe.

    Fingers crossed.

    Jeremiah Josey

  • The Dark Side of Green

    I posted a comment here about the real costs of burning hydrocarbons. It was in response to discussion on subsidies on green energy technologies, global warming and everything in between.

    http://www.linkedin.com/groupItem?view=&gid=62696&type=member&item=25411493&commentID=20660457&goback=.nmp_*1_*1_*1&report.success=8ULbKyXO6NDvmoK7o030UNOYGZKrvdhBhypZ_w8EpQrrQI-BBjkmxwkEOwBjLE28YyDIxcyEO7_TA_giuRN#commentID_20660457

    @Brian and @Brennan love the way you think.  Clear, clean, concise.  Brennan you’d never hit below the belt in a fight would you.  A pity.  In this game your opponents will do anything they can get away with.  Wear protection!

    @Leigh and @Sung… ?  Hmmm.  Yeah, go for it. You both have very interesting views on life.

    The original comment was all about letting energy technologies compete fairly. Go for it.  Green tech subsidies are paid by wage earners through their taxation so it’s just hiding the cost anyhow.  However make sure that all inputs and outputs are considered, valued and costed appropriately.

    Acid rain killed more than a few German trees thousands of kilometers from the factories producing the SO2.  Did those factories “pay” for those trees?  No.  Was that taken into account in in final sale price of their product. No. The product price did not reflect the true cost of production.

    Burning hydrocarbons is the same.  Oxygen in.  Who made it?  CO2 out as waste?  Who handles that?  Is it really “free”?  The trees in Brazil? CO2 in and O2 out.  What happens when they are cut down?  The ocean: warmer water: Less able dissolve CO2.  There’s a cost there.

    Hot, de-oxygenation water discharge from power stations.  Aquatic flora and fauna loose  their breeding ground. How does this affect the number of wild tuna in the ocean?  Is the price of electricy include for the number of tuna that can’t breed because of that “use” of water?  Not yet.

    It’s a complicated equation, and we as a society have a hard time agreeing on where to hold the next World Cup let alone agreeing on managing the true cost of the earth’s natural resources.

    I took a look at published data on what’s presently happening with the ice cap of Greenland.  Not what might be happening, but what is happening.  I extrapolated out a few years and came to the conclusion that now I ponder the building of houses on the oceans’ coast lines.  I prefer the mountains myself – I like the challenge of the climb.

    http://jeremiahjosey.wordpress.com/2009/08/14/an-inconvenient-truth-3-years-on/

    PS, I advise the owners of the worlds’ second largest oil field on how to make the most with their money and their oil production.  I see – and work – on both sides.

    Jeremiah Josey

  • The Mediocrity of Australian Politics

    Recent public movements in Australian politics reveal the truth behind the talking: National interest, getting things done, change for the good of everyone? These are not on the agenda.  Personal interest, personal gain and tepid caution: these are what drives the upcoming Australian election.

    As pointed out by Leigh Ewbank in his recent blog, the major parties are playing very low key campaigns. Both parties have identified the marginal electorates where they need to win to win the election, and they are focusing their campaigns accordingly, minimizing any disruptive or controversial discussions that may upset the status quo of their stable – already won – electorates.

    In her post, Fiona Armstrong cites that scientist believe we have 10 years to correct climate change.  In my blog post from last year on the melting of Greenland’s ice cap,  I demonstrate that the data already published shows that it is already too late:  my recommendation is that adapting to change is the best solution – it is simply too late to do anything else.

    However, is it the morally best solution?  I think not.

    100% carbon free energy production by 2020 for all of Australia? The plan already exists.  The plan is robust, it is solid and it is achievable.  Only those who work in the energy industry understand this. They know this.  For everyone else it is debate, conjecture and point scoring, and certainly leaves them exposed to influence from special interest groups, namely the coal industry.

    I worked with giants of the coal business for years in Australia – individuals that shaped Australia’s policy  not by writing papers and debating bills, but by promoting and selling coal  – billions of dollars of it.  These people are not interested in doing anything that will disrupt this business.

    Until these individuals shift, until the coal industry shifts, the Government  – along with the Australian people – may as well piss into the wind.

    We are not long term animals. We don’t think long term. We don’t act long term.  Never have been, most likely never will be.  This is just yet another disappointing example.  It is the main failure of the great democratic experiment of the 20th century.

    Hopefully 10 years is not so long term that we WILL act responsibly.

    Links

    My post on Greenland’s melting ice:
    http://jeremiahjosey.wordpress.com/2009/08/14/an-inconvenient-truth-3-years-on/

    The plan for Green Australia by 2020:
    http://media.beyondzeroemissions.org/preview-exec-sum14.pdf

    Fiona Armstrong’s post
    http://cpd.org.au/2010/07/are-you-fair-dinkum-julia/

    Leigh Ewbank’s blog
    http://therealewbank.com/2010/07/30/dealing-with-the-electoral-unimportance-of-climate-change/

    Recent Summit on Australia by 2020
    http://www.australia2020.gov.au/docs/2020_Summit_initial_report.pdf

    Jeremiah Josey

  • Food, Inc. A review of the documentary – recommended

    What a great documentary. Not just because of the story (eat food in the USA? Yuck), but also because of the great positive, do something message at the end.

    Let’s start with that message:

    “You can vote to change the system… three times a day

    Buy from companies that treat… workers… animals … and the environment .. with respect

    When you go to the supermarket
    * Choose foods that are in season
    * Buy foods that are organic
    * Know what’s in your food
    * READ LABELS

    The average meal travels 1,500 miles from the farm to the supermarket.
    * Buy foods that are grown locally
    * Shop at farmers markets
    * Plant a garden (even a small one)

    Cook a meal with your family … and eat together

    Everyone has a right to healthy food.

    Make sure your farmers market takes food stamps

    Ask your school board to provide healthy school lunches

    You can change the world with every bite…”

    More on the background of the film:

    The US food system has effectively become a inorganic, inhumane, industrialized machine for delivering as much salt, fat and sugar to consumers as possible, while keeping it all soooo secret: it puts people in jail for speaking out against it…(I couldn’t write these words if I were in 13 states of the USA, like Florida, Colorado and Texas!! http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=SLAPP).

    Amazingly complex and technical, the industrial food system does things like wash meat with highly toxic substances to kill the people killing bugs that got there because the cows are fed government subsidized corn… ??? and grow super fat chickens that can hardly walk because they are too fat for their legs (I’m happy for my small Kuwaiti chickens now!!)

    Did you know that:
    *There are a few hundred deaths each year from eating hamburgers in the USA… Bet you didn’t think that eating a hamburger could kill you that quick!! http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/EID/vol5no5/mead.htm
    *A third of Americans born after 2000 will suffer from early onset diabetes, brought on by high sugar and refined food intake…
    *Monsanto “owns” the soyabean in the US, and farmers trying to collect seeds to replant are sued
    * The average American consumes 200 pounds – 90 kg – of meat every year

    We are what we eat.

    http://www.foodincmovie.com/

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QqQVll-MP3I

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Food,_Inc.

    Jeremiah Josey

  • EU and IMF will spend $40 billion to bail out Greece. What is your opinion on this issue?

    From Linkedin Discussion: All The Global Leaders in the European Developed Markets

    My comment:

    They are just extending the credit on their “credit card”, and using future tax income (from salaries) to pay for it. This drives the wrong habits – fixing inhuman balance sheets and ignoring the human element. It drives the ‘need’ to work, and not the ‘want’ to work. Quality of life will fall, ‘happiness’ measures will decline. This is evident across the world already.

    The fundamentals of the system has to change and a bail out does not address them.

    The measures I propose are drastic but effective: 1) eliminate personal income tax and use taxes on companies to provide for the infrastructure that we require; 2) Train our children to work collaboratively rather than competitively – demolish the military styled education system, which is more than 100 years old;, 3) drive democratic work environments.

    I discuss these topics here on my blog:

    http://jeremiahjosey.wordpress.com/2009/10/24/the-new-frontier-workplace-democracy/

    http://jeremiahjosey.wordpress.com/2010/02/12/jobs-kevin-rudd-taxes/

    http://jeremiahjosey.wordpress.com/2009/11/07/the-new-world-order/

    Jeremiah Josey

  • Jobs, Kevin Rudd, Taxes

    I met Kevin Rudd once a couple of years ago before he was the Prime Minister of Australia.  It was at a local restaurant in his electorate in Brisbane.  He’s a sharp chap.  Clean dress.  Quick mind.  Academic type.  I like him.  We spoke about general things and he asked me how many jobs my company would give.  I said about 30, but I was thinking to myself, “I’m planning to have the manufacturing done in either Malaysia or Singapore.  It’s much better there: lower costs, higher quality.  The headquarters I’ll be moving to the US just as soon as I can. That’s where the market is”.  But this didn’t need saying.  It was a pleasant exchange.  He knows what he is doing and the woes of Australian manufacturing industry is for another time, Insha Allah.

    I’ve been thinking about what he was most concerned and interested about in our conversation: jobs.  “How many jobs will I give?”  Why?  Why the focus on jobs, on money, on being busy?  Well there are two reasons that I have worked out.  One is cynical and other one is naïve.

    The naïve view:

    That people need to be busy to have a “satisfactory” life.  Really?  Working 40 hours a week doing something you don’t really have a say in, or doing the same repetitive task over and over?  Computers and robots can replace most jobs in the world now, and they will eventually – in manufacturing they already have.  So who wants a job where they’re just a robot?  No one.

    The cynical view:

    The present western system of social infrastructure (i.e. Government and the services provided) relies on taxes to exist – contributions from the people in the society served by the Government.  Tax on income (income tax) and tax on things you buy (sales tax) give all the funds needed to pay for the roads; the health care; the education and the entertainment.  Sell a few bonds to cover the difference when it’s needed.  Tax comes from peoples’ pay.  Pay comes from their jobs.  They pay their income tax before they get paid.  They pay their sales tax when they spend their pay.  So people need a job to keep the government going. Simple really.  Why is this cynical?  Because a “job” is no longer a “nice” thing, and a “government” is no longer efficient at providing what it’s supposed to give.  It’s a very expensive service.  Health care in the UK anyone?  Legal support in the US my friend?  Roads and communication systems in outback Australia?

    So where does Kevin Rudd get his view-point from?  Being cynical again,  “Jobs” is easy to sell to get votes.  “Job” is only a three-letter word.  It’s easy to explain.  It’s security for you and your family: if you don’t work you don’t eat; if you don’t eat you don’t shit, if you don’t shit you die!!  So: get a job or die!!!  Everything is set up for this: our education system, our financial system, our employment system.  Everything.

    A Job “works” in our current society.  It’s the basic fundamental unit that makes everything function. Get more jobs, and everything will be all right.

    However that only applies if you have an infinite amount of everything to consume, to make, to be busy in a “job” with!  We don’t.  We’re reminded every day about how small this little planet of ours actually is.  Global warming, water pollution, land pollution, overcrowding, slums, dying soils, E.coli deaths from hamburgers, anti-biotic resistant bacteria – super bugs, mad cow diseases from feeding cows dead chickens… and so on and so on… This is what has been created: the consuming, un-conscious monster, stemming mainly in the US in the 40’s, 50’s and 60’s, mainly to provide more jobs, mainly to provide more taxes, for more Government!  More, more, more.  More profit, more food, more cars.  More everything.  But is this still working?

    The average American – the average westerner – consumes about 90 kg of meat each year.  Such a high meat consumption is way above what a human body needs and leads to all sorts of long-term social health issues (besides being overweight, there’s slow bowel movements leading to bowel cancers, transferring diseases from animals to humans and I don’t want to go on).

    If the average western person simply halved their meat intake, all the current overproduction, animal mistreatment, pesticide pollution, over subsidization and everything else associated with this industry would stop.  Over night…..  So why doesn’t it?  The need for more, more, more, and the program we have in us that drives this. Besides, what about all those “jobs”  What will people do???  :o)

    To pay for government you need taxes, for taxes you need jobs, for jobs you need business, for business you need consumers…  So the western economic system, lead by America, has become the best consumer-job-tax-government model in the world.  Around and around and around we go!  What a ride!  Stop I’m getting dizzy and want to get off!

    It’s a dangerous little trap we have caught ourselves up in.

    The irony of it all: mediation, the key to a fulfilling, happy life, takes almost zero resources to carry out.  That’s the Universe laughing at us!

    “JOB” ends up being a pretty dangerous little word.

    Don’t get me wrong, I don’t worry about this stuff.  I just ponder it, working out how it all works.  How we work.  We, people, will always do what we have always done: our own thing.  So, don’t stress.  Just become aware, conscious – really conscious – of what you are doing and you can decide if you want to keep doing it or not.

    Oh, yeah, and the solution to all of this is two 2 things.  The first is to pay for government budgets entirely with tax on company revenues (not profit, revenue) and hence cancel all personal and sales tax. This will put the soul back into the company,  and give people the freedom to grow and expand as they wish, as we have always done.  The second thing is to create democratic, participation  workplaces.  This makes your job a nice thing to do.  Train people in what this means, at school, in companies.  Everywhere.  (BMW and GE already do it)

    Easy.

    My turn.

    Jeremiah Josey

  • Antibiotics – Short Term Thinking Kills A Long Term Future

    Medical topics are not something I usually blog about, but I liked this one because what has happened here is exactly what has happened in so much of our – human – endeavors, and it stems from short term thinking.  In this case, short term thinking gave a solution that has lasted about say 80 years.

    The European Union is presently spending about 1.5B euros per year “fighting” hyper-resistant bacteria, bacteria that is resistant to antibiotics. (AFP, 18 Nov 2009)

    Fighting is the wrong word. The word should be “feeding“:  The EU is Feeding hyper-resistant bacteria.

    Overuse of “destroy-all-in-sight” antibiotics is weeding out the weak bacterial strains and strengthening the strong, and about 25,000 people in the EU with a similar number in the USA die each year due to this approach.

    Bacteria resistant to antibiotics simply eat their hosts alive. Nothing kills them, except of course, running out of food!  :o(

    And the seed was sown with the development of the first antibiotic – Penicillin – by  1928.

    So what is going on?

    Selective condition, Darwinism, survival of the fittest. I said it above: killing the weak strains of bacteria, leaving a few behind, creates stronger and stronger strains…

    And we’re the ones doing the selecting! Not on purpose of course.  Just with a bit of short term thinking.

    The method developed by Fleming in 1928 was amazing in it’s day, and it has saved countess millions of folk from all manner little bug and germ. But we stopped when we should have kept thinking about what it was we were doing…

    We didn’t think harder about how we were breeding stronger bacteria.

    It’s a method of approach destined to create one outcome, eventually: A SUPER BUG! Sometime in the future…

    (Is that Future Now? 1.5B euros buys a lot of bug poison).

    I wonder where else we could apply the same kind of longer term thinking to create such an elegant solution… ;o)

    Watch Bonnie’s presentation and find out how…

    In the mean time, minimize your use of antibiotics – don’t take them if your doctor prescribes them for you, or really, really question why you should be taking them. Your body needs to develop it’s own antibodies, T-cells. That’s what it’s designed to do.  Don’t do it for yourself.  Do it for everyone: your family, friends, neighbors, everyone.

    (OK, ok, if you look like like the living dead, have blood and puss oozing from every orifice, thrush flowering from your nostrils, then I suppose a course could be beneficial…)

    [ted id=509]

    Jeremiah Josey

    blog

Jeremiah Josey